Monday, March 16, 2015

"Jewish financiers who pulled Hitler out of the ditch" / "several Jewish bankers are backing Herr Hitler"

Pierre van Paassen (1895 - 1968), Dutch-born Canadian journalist, Unitarian minister, philosemitic, Zionistic and staunchly anti-Nazi; pictured at the Jewish Public Library in Montreal during 1945. From "This Week in JPL History: Pierre van Paassen – The Forgotten Ally" (2013-11-25, jewishpubliclibrary.org) [archive.is/5lnwm], caption: During his visit van Paassen presented the library with the manuscript for “The Forgotten Ally” a novel on Israel.

Van Paassen wrote an article in February, 1933 interviewing Wilhelm Frick, German Minister of the Interior and the first member of the NSDAP to attain political office. Read the entire article, page 1 [archive.is/R8RgY], page 2 [archive.is/hMbGk].
During the interview Van Paassen put it to the then German Minister of the Interior: "Moreover, anyone who care to investigate Jewish life but superficially soon discovers that instead of an indissoluble international solidarity as you claim, the same lines that divide society in classes operate in Jewish life. The best proof probably is that several Jewish bankers are backing Herr Hitler financially and that a Jewish bank is backing Prince Starhenberg in Austria. Since you say you are going to act strongly against the Jews, these Jewish banks are indirectly your aids. How can you speak of Jewish solidarity under the circumstance?"

Another article from 1933 by Van Paassen expands on his knowledge about Jewish bankers financing Hitler and the NSDAP, read the entire article at [archive.is//bq6jN]: "I do not blame those Jewish financiers who pulled Hitler out of the ditch by financing the Nazi Organization. It was in their interest to do so. Class interest far outweighs racial or religious associations. These men simply were consistent capitalists. They looked after and saved the interests of big business and finance in a critical hour. There is nothing to be gained in denouncing these men as traitors to the Jewish people. They never had anything in common with the Jewish masses except that they have always tried "as great Jewish Leaders" in Germany to exert their influence on the Jewish masses in one issue or another. Herr Oscar Wassermann is loyal to his class in society. Inflexibly loyal. Nothing in the world is capable of coming between him and that loyalty."

Oscar Wassermann (1869 - 1934), photo at left, head of the managing board of the Deutsche Bank between 1923 - 1933, who described himself as a non-Zionist but was president of Keren Hayesod (The Foundation Fund) the fund raising agency for Jewish settlement in Palestine, and in 1932 became the honorary chairman of the Administrative Committee of the Jewish Agency, the de-facto Jewish government of British Mandate Palestine. He believed all Jews, whether Zionists or not, should support Jewish settlement in Palestine.
Van Paassen's allegation that Oscar Wassermann, the effective CEO of the Deutsche Bank, was providing funds for the NSDAP (Nazi party) is corroborated by something Heinrich Bruening, Hitler's predecessor as German Chancellor, wrote in 1948: "... from October 1928 the two largest regular contributors to the Nazi Party were the general managers of two of the largest Berlin banks, both of the Jewish faith, and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany." - from a letter Bruening wrote to Churchill's publishers in 1948, referencing something he wrote to Churchill in 1937, read the full quote in context at [archive.is/3p7EM], published in the scholarly book "Churchill's War, vol. 1: Struggle for Power" [archive.is/9CyMK], you can also read book's 2nd volume [archive.is/wVoMn], a set of books whose author devoted attention on the Jewish financial leaders who funded Hitler [youtube.com/watch?v=rsls6WcYgtE]. More about Bruening's views on Jewish Citizens within Germany before and during the 1st half of the era of Nazi administration [archive.is/7ALHy].
According to JTA newswire (1930) [archive.is/4w6w6], it was reported, that "in London, Lord Melchett, Chaim Weizmann, Oscar Wasserman, Felix Warburg and Max Warburg will meet this afternoon in an attempt to reach a settlement regarding the functions of the Administrative Committee and the Jewish Agency's Executive, the immediate raising of an internal loan of $5,000,000, and Lord Melchett's demand that before any larger colonization scheme be undertaken in Palestine, the 1,500 Chalutzim in Palestine for many years be settled on the land."

Industrialists of many nationalities contributed to the rise of the NSDAP, including Henry Ford and Thomas Watson (Founder, IBM) of the USA, and Eugene Schneider of France, of whom not much information is available, but is mentioned in the following.
"Merchants of Death: A Study of the International Armament Industry" book by H. C. Engelbrecht, Ph.D., and F. C. Hanighen (Dodd, Mead & Co., New York, 1934): [...] In Europe their colleagues are even more active. Hitler has now become the symbol of the return of German militarism. Even before he managed to obtain supreme power there was speculation as to his financial backers. Obviously they included German industrialists fearful of socialism, communism, and the labor unions, nationalists smarting under the "insults" of the Versailles treaty, and a host of other discontented folk. But on the list of these contributors supplying funds to the Hitler movement were the names of two capitalists Von Arthaber and Von Duschnitz directors of Skoda, the great armament firm of Germany's neighbor and enemy, Czechoslovakia.
Interlocking directorates are a familiar phenomenon in the United States. The real controller of industries is frequently found in the most unexpected places. In Europe the same system prevails. And so it appears that Messrs. Von Arthaber and Von Duschnitz represent a firm which is controlled by still another firm. The head of this holding company is neither German nor Czech. He is a French citizen, M. Eugene Schneider, president of the Schneider-Creusot Company which for a century has dominated the French arms industry and which through its subsidiaries now controls most of the important arms factories in Central Europe. Some of Hitler's financial support, then, was derived from a company owned by a leading French industrialist and arms maker.
Arms merchants also own newspapers and mold public opinion. M. Schneider is more than just president of Creusot. He is the moving spirit of another great combine, the Comite des Forges. This French steel trust through one of its officers has controlling shares in the Paris newspaper Le Temps, the counterpart of the New York Times, and the Journal des Débats, which corresponds to the New York Herald Tribune. These two powerful papers constantly warn their readers of the "danger of disarmament" and of the menace of Germany. Thus M. Schneider is in a position to pull two strings, one linked to Hitler and German militarism, the other tied to the French press and French militarism. [...]

Friday, March 13, 2015

Fascist Legacy Politicians


"2003 Recall Vote: How Come Only Two Choices Were Pols With Nazi Family Ties?"
Adapted from a posting at "Los Angeles Topix Forum" [archive.today]:
This is a big state, in a big country.
Was it just a coincidence that the governor, Gray Davis, was the grandson of Nazi agent, William Rhodes Davis, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_Davis]: "...Early life and political career.. ...It was not documented, until July 20, 2008, and never previoulsy disclosed by Davis, that his grandfather was WWII Nazi agent, William Rhodes Davis, an American working to supply oil from Mexico for Hitler's Germany, and to aid the 1940 presidential election campaign of republican candidte, Wendell Wilkie. William Rhodes Davis died about August 1, 1941, a year before the birth of Gray Davis, reportedly "removed" by British spymaster Sir William Stephenson, aka "Intrepid".[7]"
We now know Arnold's grandfather, Karl, and father, Gustav, were Nazi party members, because Arnold told us... but what is up with this?
In five of the last presidential elections, people with Nazi family ties, Bush father and son, were elected to either the presidency or as VP, five times. In 2004, both Bush and Kerry were members of a tiny secret society, Skull and Bones, that "taps" only 15 Yale Univ. juniors for membership, each year.
Do you know anyone with Nazi family ties? Why are politicians with such ties so numerous in our highest elected offices? JFK was the grandchild of Joseph P. Kennedy, a well-known Nazi sympathizer... George W. Bush is the grandchild of, and George Herbert Walker is the son of Prescott Bush, himself a US Senator and a bonifide Nazi agent in the USA banking networks... California Gov. Arnold is the grandchild of Karl Schwarzenegger, Nazi SS official of Austria... former California Gov. Gray Davis is the grandchild of William Rhodes Davis, Nazi agent...
All elected just on the whim of informed voters... all just coincidence...or....?


"Exposing Arnold Schwarzenegger", (2013-10-13) [OriginalSourceMag.com/2013/10/20/exposing-arnold-schwarzenegger] [archive.org] [archive.today]

Photo showing the elder Schwarzenegger with fascist Germany Leader Adolph Hitler, meeting with fascist dictator Franco of Spain:

Photo showing Franco meeting at the White House with President Ford, 1975, showing how entrenched and trusted fascists are to "the Establishment", and why little Arnold and his family were allowed such success after World War 2.



They were called "Ratlines" because these rats just killed 20+ million Russian civilians and were allowed to continue operations with the help of the USA and allies, and the Church of Rome (with the Knights of Malta)'s sovereign banking system and travel identification:
** "Nazi Hunt: South America's Dictatorships and the Avenging of Nazi Crimes" book by German historian Daniel Stahl
** "Otto Skorzeny: The Vatican Conspiracy" [Szorzeny.greyfalcon.us/Vatican.html][archive.today]
** In 1949 letter, German SS commander Otto Wächter says Nazis on the run entered Brazil without passports [archive.today/tObpn]
** "IN A LETTER, WÄCHTER SAYS NAZIS ENTERED BRAZIL WITHOUT PASSPORTS" [archive.today/d1Mrl]
** "Read the full letter from Otto Wächter about possible escape to Brazil" [archive.today/x84IS]
** War Crimes: How Nazis Escaped Justice in South America [archive.today/41vgT]
** How the Nazis escaped justice [archive.today/Uy7GR]

** "2 SS chiefs who fled to US on new Wiesenthal list of 10 most-wanted Nazis" (2014-10) [archive.today]

Kissinger and the secret spy network of old Nazis and German aristocrats 'who plotted to overthrow West German goverment' [archive.today]
* 'The Little Service' was made up of many former Gestapo and S.S. men as well as titled barons and counts
* Kissnger even discussed with them the possibility of a coup to overthrow the government of Chancellor Willy Brandt
* The Little Service which came into being in 1969 and ran for a decade
* Was lavishly funded and with more success than state intelligence agencies which were riddled with East German moles

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

"Russia and China Are Not Imperialist" (2015-03-02, by Steven Argue)

[Photo: South Ossetians celebrate independence maintained with the help of Russia. In 2008, an unprovoked military attack by the U.S. and Israeli sponsored Georgian government on the tiny country of South Ossetia left 2,000 civilians dead. Russian military backing of the Ossetian people maintained their independence and ended imperialist aggression in a 5 day war.]

By any legitimate Marxist analysis, neither Russia nor China is imperialist. Russia is a weak capitalist country in the crosshairs of U.S. and EU imperialists who have targeted Russia for isolation, regime change, and to be broken up into three more easily controlled neo-colonial governments. This plan was even laid down on paper by top Obama advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski. China is a deformed workers state facing a combined imperialist policy of economic engagement, military encirclement, and threats.

Is Russia Imperialist?
Examples of supposed Russian imperialism do not stand up to scrutiny. Ukraine, for instance, was one of Russia’s close allies before the U.S. and EU sponsored a coup that overthrew their elected government a year ago. This is a country with a long and close relationship with Russia. If we were to find an example of Russian imperialism, it would be in Ukraine. Yet at the time of the imperialist sponsored coup, Russian Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Ukraine was extremely low.
According to 2011 figures, nearly 80% of Ukrainian foreign direct investment (FDI) in Ukraine came from the European Union. The actual number is actually a little bit lower because about 22.2% of that is comes from Cyprus, a location Ukrainian capitalists use for tax avoidance. Still, that leaves about 60% of Ukraine’s FDI coming from the EU. Russia, on the other hand, accounted for only 7.6% of FDI. This is a very low number given the historic ties of former Soviet influence. Much lower than could possibly give credence to claims that the Euromaiden “revolution” liberated Ukraine from Russian imperialist control.
Today, the relatively weak capitalist class that has developed in Russia since the Yeltsin capitalist counterrevolution in 1991 is standing up, in its own national self-interests, against a U.S. engineered and fascist infested coup government in Kiev. That government hates Ukraine’s national minorities and seeks to hurt the entire working class of Ukraine through imposing the austerity and other dictates of the IMF, EU, and USA. It is a deadly threat to the working class of Ukraine and is a dagger aimed by the U.S. imperialists at Russia itself. A victory by relatively weak Russia against U.S. imperialism will be a blow for the world’s working class which suffers under deeply under the terror and exploitation of U.S. / E.U. imperialism. An anti-imperialist victory in Ukraine will also serve to protect the oppressed Russian nationality of Crimea, protect Russia from imperialism, and protect the deformed workers state of Belarus.
The capitalist government of Russia has many problems, and needs to be overthrown in a proletarian revolution that brings back the socialist planned economy and brings workers democracy. Yet, Russia's support for the sovereignty of South Ossetia, Ukraine, Crimea, and Syria from the religious fanatics, genocidal maniacs, and extreme nationalists sponsored by the imperialist governments of the U.S. and E.U. are relatively minor actions by a weak capitalist country (Russia), against the real imperialist powers of the United States and European Union. In these situations, Leninist-Trotskyists side with the weaker countries against the imperialists, as Lenin pointed out:
‘If tomorrow, Morocco were to declare war on France, or India on Britain, or Persia or China on Russia, and so on, these would be “just”, and “defensive” wars irrespective of who would be the first to attack; any socialist would wish the oppressed, dependent and unequal states victory over the oppressor, slave-holding and predatory ‘Great’ Powers.’
(Socialism and War, July 1915)
Leninist-Trotskyists side with Russia against the great powers. This does not mean we support the capitalist system in Russia. Today, Russia still needs a socialist revolution despite Russia under Putin moving away from the total capitulation to imperialism found in the years of the Yeltsin led capitalist counterrevolution.

Is China Imperialist?
Regarding China’s foreign investments, they are in their vast majority socialist state investments, not capitalist investments. Here is part of a piece I’ve been writing on Vietnam and Laos that takes up this question:
In 2014 the People’s Republic of China became the biggest investor in Laos with the Laotian government announcing $5.1 billion in investment from China in January, 2014. Among the Chinese projects are a massive project developing rail from China through Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam. Massive hydroelectric projects are also being developed with benefits both for development and the fight against global warming, but also unfortunate disruptions and damage to the environment as well.
In 2013 the People's Republic of China also announced it is providing Laos with $49 million (US dollars) in aid and an additional $32 million (US dollars) in interest free credits. This will help keep Laos free of some of the debt slavery suffered under the loans countries are given by the World Bank and the International Development Bank. Under those imperialist capitalist loans, poor countries subsidize the wealthy ones with exorbitant interest rates on unpayable loans, causing the flow of wealth to be from poor countries to the rich. Robin Hood in reverse. In addition, restructuring is contingent on harmful policies of austerity and privatization. A form of colonialism.
For many on the left, China's investments bringing development to numerous underdeveloped countries are seen as a form of imperialism. This ignores a few basic facts. First of all, the vast majority of these investments are by the Chinese mainland state run banks or other state owned sectors. Instead of being short-term speculative investments based on the profit motive, as imperialist capitalist investments are, they are investments that seek needed commodities for China's economy which is still largely planned and socialist. Unlike the USSR's planned socialist economy, which was built in a resource rich country, China is now building up its economy, largely through the vast advantages of socialist planning, in a country that is relatively resource poor. To do so they must invest in other countries in order to import needed resources for their collectivized enterprises back in China.
To extract these resources China makes investments. For many in Africa and Asia these investments in schools, roads, railroads, and other needed infrastructure and enterprises are generally seen as a welcome change from the neglect and underdevelopment imposed by the imperial capitalists. This is not to say that there have not been abuses, but these well known abuses have come from the small minority of private Chinese enterprises functioning abroad.
The socialist character of Chinese investments was even recognized by U.S. State Department official Princeton Lyman in a 2005 presentation to the Congressional U.S.-China Commission, who said:
“China utilizes a variety of instruments to advance its interest in ways that western nations can only envy. Most of China’s investments are through state-owned companies, whose individual investments do not have to be profitable if they serve overall Chinese objectives. Thus the representative of China’s state-owned construction company in Ethiopia could reveal that he was instructed by Beijing to bid low on various tenders, without regard for profit. China’s long term objective in Ethiopia is in access to future natural resource investments, not in construction business profits.”
This has produced radically different ways of operating that have been highly praised by important African academics. Chinese investments in Laos, which includes socialist construction, aid, and interest free loans, are also likely to prove mutually beneficial for the people of Laos.

Imperialist Pivot Asia and the Paracel Islands Dispute -
A profound capitulation of the Vietnamese Communist Party to U.S. imperialism is cooperation with Obama’s aggressive military maneuvers aimed at the People’s Republic of China as a part of Pivot Asia. This has included the Vietnamese Coast Guard carrying out attacks on Chinese oil drilling in the South China Sea. These are attacks on the $1 billion deepwater oil-drilling platform that has been deployed in exploratory operations by the People’s Republic of China near the Paracel Islands. The Paracel Islands are about equidistant from the coastlines of China and Vietnam. The People’s Republic of China seized one inhabited section of the Paracel Islands in 1950 from the U.S. backed Chinese Kuomintang government, a government that was overthrown on the mainland and reduced to only maintaining power in Taiwan after the 1949 Chinese Revolution. Another uninhabited section of the Paracel Islands was seized by the French imperialists and became a claim of the South Vietnamese puppet governments thereafter until 1974. At that time, in a brief war between the People’s Republic of China and the U.S. imposed Thiệu dictatorship of South Vietnam, the PRC took control of the entire chain of islands. The islands include the Chinese city of Sansha with an estimated 3,500 inhabitants and infrastructure investments from the PRC, including the 2014 completion of a solar powered desalinization plant that now provides the additional freshwater that the city’s inhabitants needed.
Until very recently, the only people raising a fuss over the PRC’s control of the Paracel Islands have been counterrevolutionary Vietnamese and Chinese. This has changed with Vietnamese cooperation with Obma’s policy of Pivot Asia. Obama’s policy of Pivot Asia involves military encirclement of China, military provocations against China, and an attempt to dominate resources in the China Sea while at the same time carrying out capitalist economic engagement with China as an means of undermining the Chinese Revolution from within. Imperialist aggression towards China includes wrongful Japanese claims and military build up in the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands in the East China Sea. These islands are Chinese, but with the current Japanese military occupation of the islands, they could be used in military attacks against the industrialized east part of China. The islands are also crucial the PRC’s self-defense from potential naval blockade from U.S. and Japanese imperialism if imperialist war breaks out against the People’s Republic of China. In addition, in 2014 within days of U.S. threats against the PRC, the United States, Japan, and South Korea all flew aircraft over Chinese airspace, including nuclear capable B-52 bombers, to test Chinese defenses for a potential imperialist attack on China. The Vietnamese Stalinists also joined in this imperialist campaign by attacking Chinese claims to the Paracel Islands and even allowing the U.S. Navy to dock in Vietnam.
2014 actions of the Vietnamese government included sending Coast Guard and fishing vessels out to aggressively interfere with Chinese oil exploration. This has led to confrontations with China spraying water on these boats and an allegation, denied by the Chinese, of the Chinese sinking one of the Vietnamese fishing boats involved in the confrontation by ramming it. China says the boat “capsized after harassing and colliding with a Chinese fishing boat”.
One sided coverage of these events in the west helped fuel unfair anti-Chinese prejudices that have been pushed by the U.S. government and western corporate media for decades. Likewise, the Vietnamese Stalinists whipped up a nationalist frenzy that included violent chauvinistic riots as 20,000 people marched against Vietnam’s ethnic Chinese minority and carried out nationalistic anti-Chinese violence that left over 20 people dead and a hundred people injured.
The Vietnamese Coast Guard who have been participating in these attacks are themselves now partially funded by the United States, including $18 million dollars in assistance in 2014. They also receive training from the Japanese and U.S. imperialists. In addition, despite the hard fought anti-imperialist victory of 1975, U.S. naval ships are now even allowed to dock in Vietnam. This, as well as massive capitalist inroads into the Vietnamese economy, are a Stalinist betrayal of the 2.8 million Vietnamese lives given to rid Vietnam of blood thirsty imperialist troops and overthrow the capitalist system and throw the imperialists out of Vietnam.
Ultimately, what will be necessary to defend the remaining gains of the Vietnamese, Laotian, and Chinese Revolutions will be political revolutions that overthrow the repressive Stalinist bureaucracies of those countries, institute systems of workers democracy, end Vietnamese capitulations to western and Japanese imperialism, end capitalist inroads into their economies, and build an internationalist revolutionary movement to break the socialist countries out of isolation without capitulations to imperialism. This is part of a Trotskyists program that also defends these three countries from imperialist attack and internal capitalist counterrevolution as well. The lie that China is imperialist only aids U.S. and Japanese counterrevolutionary aggression directed at the People’s Republic of China.
The false notion that China is imperialist only aids U.S. and Japanese counterrevolutionary aggression directed at the People’s Republic of China. Likewise, the lie that Russia is imperialist only aids western imperialist ethnic cleansing of the Russian speaking minority in Ukraine, imperialist aggression against the people of Syria as part of an intervention that formed ISIS and continues to back religious fanatics against the Syrian and Kurdish people, and aids imperialist sanctions against Belarus with its remaining socialist economy, as well as other western imperialist acts of aggression against the world’s working class and farmers.

End U.S. and EU Imperialist Sanctions Against Russia!
End U.S. and Japanese Military Threats and Encirclement of China!

-Steven Argue of the Revolutionary Tendency
Revolutionary Tendency
[https://www.facebook.com/RevolutionaryTendency]

Sunday, March 1, 2015

More Material Wealth leads to Less Reliance on Religion

"Faith Versus Finance: Does affluence affect spirituality?" by Julian Archer (2015-03-01, AdventistWorld.org)

Seesaws, or teeter-totters, are common in playgrounds around the world. The name “seesaw” is a direct Anglicization of the French word ci-ça, meaning literally, “this-that.” The seesaw is an “either/or,” a“this or that,” mechanical device. You can have only one side at the top at any given time; never both.Is that how it is with faith and finance? Can we have only faith or finance, never both? Or is it only great faith and great finance that tend to seesaw?

What I’ve Learned in the Playground “Down Under” -
According to the latest reports, my home country of Australia is one of the most affluent nations on earth.The 2013 Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report shows that Australian adults have the second-highest wealth level of any country on the planet (second only to Switzerland), and that our median wealth level per adult is the highest on the planet, more than double Switzerland’s. This means that we’re not only extremely wealthy (even though we may not always feel it), but our wealth is also more evenly distributed than in many other nations. As a Christian who spent many years trying to maintain a strong relationship with God while my income was high enough for me to live self-sufficiently. I must ask the question”What impact does affluence have on spirituality, including my own?” Does it lead us nearer to God, to a greater faith? Or does it turn our eyes from Him? Or perhaps finances are completely unrelated to faith?

Searching for the Answer -
In 2009 a Gallup poll reported on their surveys conducted in 114 countries. One of the questions the Gallup organization asked was “Is religion an important part of your daily life?” Gallup also researched the per-capita income levels for each country and then made correlations between the two. The data made it clear that the see-saw effect is in full swing. The higher the per-capita income of a nation, the lower the role of religion in daily life,and vice versa. Let’s zoom in on some of the nations at the top and bottom of the“faith versus finance” seesaw. The accompanying table is based on data from both the Gallup poll and the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report. The data clearly show a great divide—in both the importance of religion and levels of wealth—between the world’s richest (less religious) and poorest (more religious) nations. It could be argued that the reason for the high wealth ranking of these`“Top 10” wealthiest nations shown in the table is that they originally based their societies and business practices on Christian principles, and God blessed them. Times are changing, however. The seesaw has tilted, and affluence is toppling both religion and spirituality. Mahatma Gandhi once said, “The fact is, the moment that financial stability is assured, spiritual bankruptcy is also assured.” Gandhi seems to be reflecting Jesus’ words: “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God” (Mark 10:25). I know from my personal experience that when a person is financially blessed they’re in the most spiritually dangerous stage of their life. The higher my income went, the less I felt my need for God. My income taxed my spirituality.

Living the Dream?
As I run Faith Versus Finance seminars, I see that most affluent Christians, in their deepest hearts, really do want a vibrant, life-changing relationship with God. But they’re frustrated. They feel as if they’re being forced to live a life focused on earthly priorities when they know that true satisfaction and fulfillment come only from eternal things. I can hear their cries because I spent years “living the dream” but aching for a deeper relationship with God. I finally realized that God’s mate-rial blessings had become a curse in my spiritual life. It’s not that God’s blessings are curses, but we often use them in such a way that they become curses. When we allow God’s material blessings to fill our hearts, we can’t open our heart’s door to Jesus. And that’s a curse—an eternal curse. The Bible is full of examples in which the mistreatment of God’s blessings led to curses. In Deuteronomy 6, Moses tells the children of Israel that they’re about to enter a“land flowing with milk and honey”(verse 3). But then he adds the clincher: “When you have eaten and are full—then beware, lest you forget the Lord” (verses 11, 12). It’s a powerful reminder that a full stomach can make us very sleepy

Seesaw Snapshot -
So what does this seesaw look like in the day-to-day life of a comfortable Christian? Let’s look at three areas:Construction: When I “build bigger barns” and store up my treasures hereon earth, it distracts me from eternal riches. I start to worry about them, and I invest increasing amounts of time and energy into protecting and multiplying the blessings instead of trusting completely in Him. My finances rise, but my faith falls; and I often don’t even realize it (see Rev. 3:17).
Time: The first indicator of spiritual apathy is the crippling and cropping of my time with God. This usually occurs during periods of increased time pressures because of financial, personal, entertainment, or other priorities. The problem could last just a few mornings, or perhaps even many years. When I neglect to spend quality time praying and studying the Scriptures, my relationship with Christ weakens.
Heart: Whenever I fill my heart with the gifts instead of the Giver, my faith falls. When Christ knocks on the door of my material-blessings-filled heart (verse 20), the sound of His knocking is muffled. And even when I do hear it, I struggle to climb over all my material blessings to reach out and open the door.
Ellen White referred to this crowded-heart syndrome when she wrote, “The heavenly Guest is standing at your door, while you are piling up obstructions to bar His entrance. Jesus is knocking through the prosperity He gives you. He loads you with blessings to test your fidelity, that they may flow out from you to others. Will you permit your selfishness to triumph? Will you squander God’s talents, and lose your soul through idolatrous love of the blessings He has given?” (Ellen G. White, in Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, Nov. 2, 1886). This is very challenging territory,but it begs the question Does our faith always need to decrease as our affluence rises? Is the faith-versus-finance seesaw an unchangeable, universal principle?

Breaking the Seesaw -
God offers a cure for every person who realizes that their affluent life-style is damaging their spiritual life. It’s a heart attack! Not a cardiac arrest,but a total spiritual heart transplant.In Ezekiel 36:26 God tells us that He wants to give us a new heart, a loving heart of flesh, to replace our materialistic heart of stone. We must be converted again. We can be active church members and financial supporters of God’s work but still contract spiritual heart disease. We need a total heart transplant. Instead of faith versus finance, it can and should be faith and finance. Or even better, faith regardless of finance.May we be true to God in all things, including our material blessings.

Country: Mean Adult Wealth (US$,000) / % Answered “NO” to “Is religion an important part of your daily life?
Switzerland: 513 / 57%
Australia: 403 / 67%
Norway: 380 / 78%
Luxembourg: 315 / 64%
USA: 301 / 36%
Sweden: 299 / 88%
France: 296 / 74%
Singapore: 282 / 53%
Belgium: 256 / 68%
Denmark: 255 / 83%
THE GREAT DIVIDE
Thailand: 8 / 2%
India: 5 / 9%
Haiti: 4 / 8%
Pakistan: 4 / 4%
Kenya: 3 / 3%
Cambodia: 3 / 3%
Nepal: 2 / 5%

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Statement By Mao Tse-tung in Support of the Black Liberation Struggle in the United States

[Photo: American exiled civil rights leader Robert F. Williams in China with Mao Tse-tung.]


Introduction by Steven Argue of the Revolutionary Tendency:
Robert F. Williams, a civil rights leader and advocate of Black armed self-defense, was forced to flee the United States for Cuba and then later also moved to the People's Republic of China. The writings of Robert F. Williams, including "Negroes With Guns" and his Cuban sponsored radio broadcasts into the semi-fascist American south in his program called "Radio Free Dixie" played a far greater role in the abolition of Jim Crow segregation than most people know. The following is a statement on the question of Black liberation issued by Mao Tse-tung on behalf of the struggle for Black liberation in the United States requested from Mao by Robert F. Williams. While I think Mao makes a few mistakes in this statement, and I am a Trotskyist and not a Maoist, I also think that this is an important piece of history most people don't know about that is worth sharing. This piece is available on the Marxist Internet Archive. I provide a link at the end of Mao's piece to that site as well as a link to a piece I wrote on police murders with impunity in the United States that includes a discussion of the importance of Robert F. Williams.
Regarding Mao. Imperialist propagandists falsely portray him as a mass murderer and a devil. All leaders of real revolutions are seen this way by the imperialists, and they lie. Yet, while Mao helped free a large portion of humanity from capitalism and imperialism, Mao was also guilty of terrible crimes.
Mao led a socialist revolution to power that was, and remains, one of the most important socialist revolutions in world history. That revolution doubled life expectancy in China during Mao's rule, brought rapid economic advancements and job creation with a socialist planned economy, brought big gains in women's rights, brought a near total eradication of rampant illiteracy, brought a sweeping land reform, brought an abolition of chattel slavery in the most backward regions like Tibet, brought a separation of religion and state in the most backward regions like Tibet, brought the abolition of feudalism in the most backward regions like Tibet, brought the overthrow of capitalism and the beginning of rapid development for a poverty stricken and underdeveloped country, brought true independence from the sphere of U.S. neo-colonial control, and brought direct support to the Korean Revolution as the Korean people faced brutal imperialist attack in the so-called "Korean War" where the U.S. imperialists murdered 5 million Koreans.
Yet, Mao also carried out terrible betrayals. These included unforgivable repression against Trotskyists who stood to the left of him on some important issues. Mao arrested all known Trotskyists and their friends and families upon coming to power. Some were never seen again. Others were released upon Mao's death in 1976. Mao also unforgivably ganged up with the United States against the USSR as a conservative means of gaining trade with capitalist countries and building socialism in one country as opposed to the Marxist-Leninist-Trotskyist program of revolutionary proletarian internationalism. In addition, Mao oppressed homosexuals as part of Stalin's program as opposed to Lenin and Trotsky's that abolished all laws against homosexuality after the Russian Revolution. In regards to medicine, Mao greatly hurt people's health by giving state backing to Traditional Chinese Medicine as opposed to a program for providing scientific medicine for all.
Despite these errors, the 1949 Chinese Revolution was an important step forward for humanity.


*****

Statement Supporting the American Negroes In Their Just Struggle Against Racial Discrimination by U.S. Imperialism
(August 8, 1963) Mao Tse-tung [Note: We reprint this statement in commemoration of the third anniversary of the day Chairman Mao made it. —Peking Review Ed.]
An American Negro leader now taking refuge in Cuba, Mr. Robert Williams, the former President of the Monroe, North Carolina, Chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People, has twice this year asked me for a statement in support of the American Negroes’ struggle against racial discrimination. On behalf of the Chinese people, I wish to take this opportunity to express our resolute support for the American Negroes in their struggle against racial discrimination and for freedom and equal rights.
There are more than 19 million Negroes in the United States, or about 11 per cent of the total population. They are enslaved, oppressed and discriminated against — such is their position in society. The overwhelming majority are deprived of their right to vote. In general, only the most backbreaking and despised jobs are open to them. Their average wages are barely a third or a half those of the white people. The proportion of unemployment among the Negroes is the highest. In many states they are forbidden to go to the same school, eat at the same table, or travel in the same section of a bus or train as the white people. Negroes are often arrested, beaten up or murdered at will by the U.S. authorities at various levels and by members of the Ku Klux Klan and other racists. About half the American Negroes are concentrated in eleven southern states, where the discrimination and persecution they suffer are especially shocking.
The American Negroes are awakening and their resistance is growing stronger and stronger. Recent years have witnessed a continuous expansion of their mass struggle against racial discrimination and for freedom and equal rights.
In 1957 the Negro people in Little Rock, Arkansas, waged a fierce struggle against the barring of their children from public schools. The authorities used armed force against them, creating the Little Rock incident which shocked the world.
In 1960 Negroes in more than twenty states held “sit-in” demonstrations protesting against racial segregation in local restaurants, shops and other public places.
In 1961 the Negroes launched the “freedom riders” campaign to oppose racial segregation in public transportation, a campaign which rapidly spread to many states.
In 1962 the Negroes in Mississippi fought for the equal right to enroll in colleges and met with bloody suppression by the authorities.
This year, the American Negroes-started their struggle early in April in Birmingham, Alabama. Unarmed and bare-handed Negro people were arrested en masse and most barbarously suppressed merely for holding meetings and parades against racial discrimination. On June 12 Mr. Medgar Evers, a leader of the Negro people in Mississippi, was murdered in cold blood. Defying brutality and violence, the indignant Negro masses waged their struggle even more heroically and quickly won the support of Negroes and other people of various strata throughout the United States. A gigantic and vigorous nationwide struggle is going on in nearly every city and state, and the struggle is mounting. American Negro organizations have decided to start a “freedom march” on Washington on August 28, in which 250,000 people will take part.
The speedy development of the struggle of the American Negroes is a manifestation of sharpening class struggle and sharpening national struggle within the United States; it has been causing increasing anxiety among U.S. ruling circles. The Kennedy Administration is insidiously using dual tactics. On the one hand, it continues to connive at and take part in discrimination against Negroes and their persecution, and it even sends troops to suppress them. On the other hand, in the attempt to numb the fighting will of the Negro people and deceive the masses of the country, the Kennedy Administration is parading as an advocate of “the defence of human rights” and “the protection of the civil rights of Negroes,” calling upon the Negro people to exercise “restraint” and proposing the “civil rights legislation” to Congress. But more and more Negroes are seeing through these tactics of the Kennedy Administration. The fascist atrocities of the U.S. imperialists against the Negro people have exposed the true nature of so-called American democracy and freedom and revealed the inner link between the reactionary policies pursued by the U.S. Government at home and its policies of aggression abroad.
I call on the workers, peasants, revolutionary intellectuals, enlightened elements of the bourgeoisie and other enlightened persons of all colours in the world, whether white, black, yellow or brown, to unite to oppose the racial discrimination practised by U.S. imperialism and support the American Negroes in their struggle against racial discrimination. In the final analysis, national struggle is a matter of class struggle. Among the whites in the United States, it is only the reactionary ruling circles who oppress the Negro people. They can in no way represent the workers, farmers, revolutionary intellectuals and other enlightened persons who comprise the overwhelming majority of the white people. At present, it is the handful of imperialists headed by the United Slates, and their supporters, the reactionaries in different countries, who are oppressing, committing aggression against and menacing the overwhelming majority of the nations and peoples of the world. We are in the majority and they are in the minority. At most, they make up less than 10 per cent of the 3,000 million population of the world. I am firmly convinced that, with the support of more than 90 per cent of the people of the world, the American Negroes will be victorious in their just struggle. The evil system of colonialism and imperialism arose and throve with the enslavement of Negroes and the trade in Negroes, and it will surely come to its end with the complete emancipation of the black people.

This Statement is on Marxist Internet Archive
[https://www.marxists.org/subject/china/peking-review/1966/PR1966-33h.htm]

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

For Russia's Survival, a Unity of Heritage and History

"Number one goal for Russian world" by Evgeny Chernyshev (2015-01-27) [http://novorossia.su/ru/node/13428] [https://archive.today/iRE7I] [article machine-translated from the original Russian language, and adapted for syntax]:
To date, we can confidently say that the union of Orthodox Christians with supporters of the Soviet project is a philosophical and ideological number one task for the entire Russian world. If Russia will solve this problem, it will rise to its highest pitch, unite around him all the Russian world and become the center of attraction of all free mankind who does not want to live under the thumb of the West. If we do not solve this problem, we will find ourselves on the threshold of the inner turmoil and destruction. Too powerful forces interested in this.

The fact that the Soviet system, and the more Orthodox are the worst enemies of the West, confirmed by a simple historical fact: the West has consistently fought against both. First, it was destroyed by the Orthodox Russian Empire, then - the atheistic Soviet Union. Today, when Russia officially is neither communist nor Orthodox, and has no ideology, the West comes from anger emerging in Russia association of Orthodox Christians and supporters of the Soviet project. How Come? Because it is - the key to the revival of the Russian world.

Naturally, we are not talking and can not talk about reconciliation Christian worldview with communist ideology, because in some areas they directly contradict each other. But this is not necessary. We need no mixing of the two worldviews to some one that does not suit anybody, and bringing people together on the basis of love for the Fatherland. And since we have one homeland, then one story. This is the primary postulate from which to draw on. The history of Russia is based on the Orthodox Church, but also had a very important Soviet "saying" that it is important to decipher and write in the context of the "language" of Russian history.

Orthodoxy united dozens of Slavic tribes into a single Russian people, who have historically formed exactly as Orthodox people who has mastered half of Eurasia and prityanuvshy to itself the mass of other nations, and even gave many state. At the same time, the Orthodox Russia has failed to respond to the historic challenge of Western "progress" under the guise of which the Empire was destroyed, but there were signs of this long before 1917.

Soviet ideology allowed to make a grand economic breakthrough, won a great victory, to rebuild the country, but gradually in the minds of the people has been reduced to the pursuit of Western belongings, chewing gum and entertainment.

Already on these examples, it is clear that Russian history can "speak" in different ways.

In this historical moment the Russian world is undergoing a vital need for a new mobilization, and this brings the need for extremely orthodox and Soviet-communist world outlook of the Stalinist era, and who have a common goal - the revival of the whole of Russia, and the common enemy - the liberal globalism. Yes, they understand it differently, but it is not an obstacle for their synthesis. Combining Orthodoxy and Soviet communist ideology means not mixing them, and joining forces. This association is quite possible, if you leave Orthodoxy niche and communism - a. Orthodoxy - this world-leading human salvation in the kingdom of God. Communism - the ideology of economic dispensation of society on the basis of justice. That's how it understood and accepted at the time the Russian people and Russian communism that is very different from Western communism, has degenerated into the legalization of all abominations. Russian Communism - an ideal community order in a state in which the interests of the whole above selfish. The Russian soul is still in the depths of the remaining peasants, reached for communism as the new edition of the Orthodox faith. Unfortunately, the materialism of communism has evolved into consumerism, but communism itself remains in the memory of the people his desire for perfection. Did the holy Orthodoxy does not put the same problem? And Orthodoxy, and Soviet (especially Stalin!) System refer to a person's identity, appealing to the highest spiritual ideals, and are both imperial spirit. Just communism - is the economic system, and should not claim to ideological universality, and only Orthodoxy and certainly not the Ministry of Economy.

Originally communism itself as a Western invention, has little to do with a Russian soul, it is enough to read the manifesto of the Communist Party in 1848 Abolition of the family, Free female, general promiscuity - no, it attracted people of Russian Communism. It has attracted a deep mystical messianic feeling inherent Russian and calls for sacrifice for the salvation of all. The Russian people have adopted communism as a way to Calvary, and its difficulties - as the sufferings of Christ. And this comparison is not an exaggeration, since the USSR had his crucifixion and at the same time for the redemption of all - the Great Patriotic War. Not accidentally during the war was the reconciliation of the Orthodox Church and the state, as well as an appeal to the thousands of years of Russian history. Internal Russian religiosity merely "expressed" in communist terms.

Stalin era has unusual historical jewel - it is an experience of successful confrontation with the West, global experience rapid spiritual and economic mobilization of the country. This is what Tsarist Russia at the time could not do, was hooked integration into the capitalist western world. This experience is an invaluable Stalinist period, and it certainly will learn more.

Normally, as an argument against the thesis of Orthodoxy on the separation of church (ie organization) from the state, and besides, enshrined in the constitution. In the eyes of the liberal-coded paper contract clause (a constitution by its very nature is always a contract) is inviolable canon, but in fact this thesis is Western invention, from which it does not immediately need to give up, but do not need to and idolize.

The fact that the separation of church and state - a natural result of European - and only the European! - History, due to the Reformation. For centuries, the papacy as the spiritual power of Europe, struggling with the government to crush it under itself. Temporal power, on the contrary, tried to subdue the papacy itself. In this struggle, and the Thirty Years War 1618-1648 gg. and hammered out the compromise that the European states should be arranged at a legal separation from their church, and the churches began to be thought of as an organization that they have in fact, as opposed to the Church as the Body of Christ (Eph. 1, 22), as it understands Orthodoxy.

Same logic of Russian history unfolded in a completely different direction. The Church has always been at the same time with the state, and Russian state supported Russian Orthodox Church. In this sense, Russia was a worthy successor to Byzantium, embodying the symphony of powers, which is embodied in our coat of arms. Two-headed eagle symbolizes the unity of the spiritual and the government under the general head of the invisible - God. It was the thought of the Empire mission - to keep the world from the end, is the last obstacle to holding the son of perdition. It is this thought and mission of communism - to save the world from falling into the global capitalist slavery, and the USSR - indicate to all nations the way to freedom. It is the Christian motivation - to be free, free from the shackles of government money, only expressed in different terms. A "Code of the Builder of Communism" - except he was not like the "code" of the Orthodox Christian? Christianity without Christ - perhaps that's what the Soviet Union sought to implement. Although no Christian can accept "without Christ," motivation actions and aspirations of the Soviet man Stalin era wore it Christian. It is no coincidence that at the end of his life, Stalin, understanding the role of Orthodoxy to Russia, has become the path of reconciliation serial Orthodoxy and the Soviet state. Unfortunately, this was prevented by an early death.

Opponents of the joint efforts of the Russian Orthodox Church and the state have to destroy inevitable in this case, the strengthening of state power and the restoration of Russia's borders and spiritual health of the Russian people. Nobody like ROC, is not interested in strengthening the Russian state, even if it is clearly anti-religious character, as it was in the USSR. Powerful Russian state to the ROC - is the ark of salvation. It is for this from all sides and attacked the Church. Because it is labeled in Russian.

Thesis on the separation of church and state more dangerous by the fact that national boundaries are changing. Exemplary embodiments of this thesis we see in today's Ukraine, which has replaced the church canons nonentity "jurisdiction" and began a methodical expulsion of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church on the sole ground that it is an autonomous part of the Russian Orthodox Church. Armed with this thesis, seized power in Kiev rebels want to "get the most" from the fence, which they temporarily fenced off from the Great Little Russia. And those who support this thesis, inevitably pours water on a "mill split" Holy Russia. Do we need such a thesis? Orthodox should be in the same Russian state - that is our answer to the thesis about the "separation of church and state"!

Patriarch Kirill often uses the expression "all the historical Rus'. How Come? Because the ROC is obvious. Think about it: living Russian Church considers the unity of Holy Russia as a self-evident fact! Where else can you find such a stronghold? And whose memory is commemorated annually in the ROC (and UOC-MP)? Only of the most venerated saints it (among others): hierarchs Moscow Metropolitan Peter (metropolitan department has transferred from Kiev to Vladimir and then to Moscow), Alexis, Jonah, Philip, Patriarch Hermogenes, worn by Polish invaders in 1612, St. Sergius of Radonezh and St. Seraphim of Sarov, St. Alexander Nevsky and Dmitry Donskoy, Xenia of Petersburg, Matrona of Moscow and many other holy ascetics of Russian Orthodoxy. No wonder among Orthodox Christians in Ukraine the idea of unity with the rest of Russia enjoys the greatest support. In these circumstances, to speak out against the ROC simply suicidal, and this activity can only come from the enemies of Russia.

We must remember that the unity of the Russian land does not follow from the communist ideology. However, it does not follow from the Orthodox dogma, but the Russian Orthodox Church preserves the continuity of Russian history as their "pedigree" and especially because it holds dear. Therefore, the attacks on the Church of the Patriots are harmful - they pull the rug out from under Russian unity. Unfortunately, the Russian Orthodox Church remains the last, but, fortunately, very strong thread linking Russia. And strengthen it - our common task. Believe it or not - a private matter, but to understand and accept the historical significance of the Russian Orthodox Church shall each. Well, that "the Church hinders progress" - how many more of these, which believe it when the West imposed "progress" has long svёlsya to one thing - how to destroy the human race (or, at least, "unnecessary" part that interferes with the distribution of wealth)?

No, "progress", which dreams of Russian communism - is quite another. He refers to a person's identity, like Christianity. And, amazingly, when the hard materialism he embodied the ideal of Christianity - sacrifice. Tens of millions of people have worked and sacrificed themselves for the sake of future generations, creating all the things we still use: at home, in which we live, the plants on which we work. Sometimes it seems that the mission of the Soviet era was that for centuries ahead to create a reserve, reserve of strength sufficient to live up to a new leap. Today it is the need to have a loud knocking. Time is short. It is time to discard the infighting and unite efforts in the fight against the common enemy - the liberal globalization, building a global concentration camp of tolerance, which will destroy all.

It is time to discard the mutual claims and understand that the Church is not the economic system, and the Stalinist economic plan is not an organization for the destruction of temples. Their peaceful coexistence and integration effort is not only possible, but necessary. Church and state are not necessarily adversaries, but allies. "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God the God" (Matt. 22, 21). This is something that we have not successfully implemented in the twentieth century. This is what we need to do in this century.

Friday, January 23, 2015

Fascist Vanguards of Eastern Europe and the Republican Heritage Committees of the USA

"Old Nazis, the New Right, and the Republican Party" (1991, South End Press) [http://books.google.com/books?id=ZWAHmLuZeIoC]
Read the book (preview edition provided by Google books) [http://books.google.com/books?id=ZWAHmLuZeIoC&printsec=frontcover]
---
Book review by Timothy Christenfeld, Columbia Univ. Copyright 1991 Reed Business Information, Inc.:
Bellant convincingly documents three arguments in this short, journalistic book. First, many people who had been active in Nazi or pro-Nazi groups in Eastern Europe in the 1930s and 1940s subsequently came to this country, often under the auspices of the Displaced Persons Commission. Second, many of these emigres then became active in political and ethnic groups affiliated with the Republican Party, providing financial and electoral support and crusading relentlessly against Communism. Third, and most important, some of the most unsavory elements of the anti-Communist right gained a foothold in official foreign policy circles under Reagan. Bellant's case is strong and disturbing, but his book is terribly organized, and the meaningful arguments are mixed in with overstated claims (especially the suggestions of a fascist conspiracy) and charges based only on political disagreement, not malfeasance. An optional purchase.
---
Response from a reader:
Most (95% ?) of Bellant's book wouldn't be the least bit controversial (even to hard core rightists) if the Nazi Wartimes Disclosure Act had been passed by congress in 1999. But alas, it was not. According to a Baltimore Sun article ('Government May Soon Open Files on Nazi War Criminals', Aug. 2, 1998, p. 20A): "Under pressure from Congress, the Justice Department and other agencies may be forced to declassify tens of thousands of top-secret documents describing the U.S. intelligence community's dealings with Nazi war criminals in the Cold War years. Legislation to open most of those files has already passed the Senate and could come up for a vote in the House this week. Some historians suspect that the opened files could cause 'tremendous embarrassments' for the United States."
Less than one year later the GOP congress voted against passage, and that was it. No one has heard much about it since.
The reason for reinforcing Bellant's book is that the putative basis for widespread former Nazi use and recruitment (including in our intelligence agencies, e.g. CIA) would have been laid bare....but it seemed evident to me even then that the GOP congress wished to cover its party tracks and all possible links to Nazi interests. This point has also been made by author Christopher Simpson in his book, 'Blowback: America's recruitment of Nazis, and its disastrous effect on our domestic and foreign policy', Collier / Macmillan, 1988.
This is why I believe, that for the general reader with political interest, it may be advisable to read Simpson's book and Mann's- Ornstein's before going to Bellant's. Let us say if that order is adhered to there is less likelihood of outright disbelief or criticisms of evidence lacking. Indeed, it would be ludicrous to believe that if Nazi recruitment were made (e.g. from Gehlen Org) there could also not be political influence.
Bellant, in his book, merits kudos for going one step further and documenting the insertion of Nazi-affiliated S.S. groups from Latvia, and the Ukraine into the Republican Heritage Groups Council in the 1980s. Many of Bellant's conjectures on associations, groups - apart from establishing direct ties of former S.S. affiliates to the GOP, were also well substantiated in the Newsweek article ('The Right Wing Web', February 22, 1999, p.34). This was especially in regards to the connections of the Regnery Press and its propagandizing.
I originally had some reservations regarding Bellant's treatment (on page 18) of Philip Guarino and his links to Licio Gelli, a 'Blackshirt' member of Mussolini's Fascist Party. I was happy to find subsequent confirmation in David Yallop's (1984) book, 'In God's Name' (p. 442). Another interesting tidbit is that Guarino was involved in John Connally's 'Committee for the Defense of the Mediterranean' which propagandized on the Italian Communist Party (PCI) threat to the West. (Recall Connally was seated with JFK in his limo when the shots rang out in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963, and he was wounded by a separate shot, contrary to the Warren Commission's fabrication of a single bullet.)
All in all, Bellant's book is an excellent read and provides a plausible basis for understanding the extremist swing of the current GOP.


"Will Bush Purge Nazi Collaborators in the G.O.P.?" (1988) [http://www.skepticfiles.org/socialis/bushnazi.htm] [https://archive.today/DBmMB]

"George Bush, anti-Semites and the Big Lie: Chronology of a Coverup" (1988-09-01) [http://www.skepticfiles.org/socialis/bushhoax.htm] [https://archive.today/Twfyg]

"Nazi-affiliated Emigres And The Republican Party" (1988-09-18) [http://articles.philly.com/1988-09-18/news/26229962_1_ethnic-coalition-emigres-american-nationalities] [https://archive.today/0GoPu]

President Gerald R. Ford's Remarks to Members of the National Republican Heritage Groups Council (1975-05-16) [http://www.ford.utexas.edu/library/speeches/750262.htm] [https://archive.today/RF7E2]

President Ronald Reagan: Remarks at the Convention of the National Republican Heritage Groups Council (1985-05-17) [http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1985/51785a.htm] [https://archive.today/6WmTE]

"On Ultra Nationalists: When You Slow-Dance with the Devil, You Can't See His Face" (2014-03-30) [http://www.opednews.com/populum/printer_friendly.php?content=a&id=177366] [https://archive.today/fFkUZ], [begin excerpt]: Since the 1970s, when they proved their importance by delivering five states in a US Presidential election, the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations (ABN)and its affiliate Ukrainian Congressional Committee of America (UCCA)have been remaking the US government in their image. Now they make common cause with their sister Neo-Cons. They are the kingmakers in US federal elections, and both political parties now march to their tune.
At the end of WW2 the Nazi political ideologist Carl Schmidt was asked how such a brilliant man could justify the atrocities of Hitler's Third Reich. His answer: When you slow-dance with the Devil, you can't see his face.  With the unfolding events in Ukraine, it's time now to look in the Devil's face.
President Obama said it was outrageous to think that America would support Ultra Nationalists in Ukraine. Did he lie? You decide.
"For the same day your court in Donetsk ruled to strip [Ukrainian Ultra Nationalist hero Stepan] Bandera of his Hero title, God bestowed the best gift possible to our family: the birth of Stepan Bandera's fifth great-grandchild. The KGB succeeded in killing his great-grandfather. But try as you might, you will never stop the Banderas Coming soon to a gene pool near you! Signed, Glory to Ukraine! Glory to Her Children! In prostration, S.A. Bandera, Grandson of Hero of Ukraine." This was the third-generation Stepan Bandera's open letter to Ukrainian President Victor Yanukovych in 2010.
Yes! Stepan Bandera is alive and well. He may well be invited to a mid-summer barbeque at the White House and down a few beers with President Barak Obama and Senator John McCain. The takeover of Ukraine by those who march to his ulra-nationalist drumming has allowed seventy years' worth of US foreign policy to pay off with bigger dividends than anyone could have imagined.
The first Bandera's grandson is a former editor and reporter for the Kiev Post, and you can read his own take on Ultra Nationalists like Oleh Tyanhybok here.
From a Kiev Post interview lunch with the grandson of national hero Stepan Bandera, by Paul Miazga, Kyiv Post Staff Writer, April 20, 2005: "Bandera, who currently writes for New York City's [Ukrainian] Diaspora newspaper The  National Tribune , never knew his grandfather, who was killed by a KGB agent in 1959. But he has an affinity with him.... "Our family has always been very tight, very Ukrainian.' Bandera's father--also a nationalist activist--died under mysterious circumstances back in 1984, just like his grandfather. "I came to Ukraine looking for a fight,' he says."
Aside from being a journalist supporting his family's claim to an Ultra Nationalist Ukraine, Mr. Bandera plays a much larger role behind the scenes. This second-generation homegrown Canadian Ukrainian Ultra Nationalist helped Americanize the ultra-nationalist movement in Ukraine through his influence in America's civil, political, and business circles.
The CUSUR (Center for US-Ukrainian Relations) was started as a result of the continuing support for a free Ukraine in three US presidential administrations. The "free" in "free Ukraine" refers to an ultra-nationalist Ukraine that Mr. Bandera's grandfather would be proud of.
First under President Bill Clinton, and then through two terms of GW Bush, both the US and Ukrainian governments, and businesses in the two countries, built extensive networks that culminated in the event-driving Maidan movement for Ukrainian integration with the West.
The CUSUR and the UCCA (Ukrainian Congressional Committee of America) are intertwined and so powerful in American politics that even a casual glance at their meeting notes or plans will give you the chills. Both groups are in fact OUN (b) (Ukrainian Ultra Nationalist) organizations that operate freely in the US, influencing National Security issues , Foreign Policy , and American National Politics.
Both Congressional Durbin brothers and Secretary of State John Kerry are enthusiastic supporters. Senator Durbin, a Lithuanian-American, has in fact stated during John Kerry's bid for the Presidency, "If John Kerry is elected, Kerry will work vigorously for Ukraine's continued independence and prosperity." That position, of course, supports the UCCA view .
Where does Mr. Bandera fit into all of this? For the last seventy years, the US has only recognized one Ukrainian government. According to CIA-released documents to which I provided links in previous articles, that one government is the Ukrainian government in Exile , led by the Stetskos. That government has now been brought back to Ukraine and cemented with the Maidan.[end excerpt]


"Nazi collaborator invited to White House in 2006" (2008-12-08) [http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/12/18/674790/-Nazi-collaborator-invited-to-White-House-in-2006] [https://web.archive.org/web/20120118095756/http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/12/18/674790/-Nazi-collaborator-invited-to-White-House-in-2006]


"G.H.W. Bush used Nazi-Collaborators to get Elected"
August 2004 Issue # 54 Press for Conversion! pgs. 38 to 41
[coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/54/54_38-41.pdf] [https://web.archive.org/web/20140205231149/http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/54/54_38-41.pdf]:
Russ Bellant is an investigative journalist. In 1984, he contributed to an awardwinning NBC documentary on American fascist, Lyndon LaRouche. Bellant’s books include: The Religious Right in Michigan Politics (Silver Spring, MD: Americans for Religious Liberty, 1996) and Coors Connection: How Coors Family Philanthropy Undermines Democratic Pluralism (St. Paul, MN: Consortium, 1992). The latter examines Coors family funding of unionbusting, homophobia, racism and covert operations of the extreme right. (Coors and Canada’s Molson merged in July 2004)
---
Source: Old Nazis, the New Right and the Republican Party, Boston: South End Press, 1991.
The émigré fascist network within the Republican Party represents a small but significant element of the coalition that brought Ronald Reagan into the White House. It is from this network that the George H.W. Bush presidential campaign assembled its ethnic outreach unit in 1988. When news of this emerged, Bush’s ethnic outreach unit saw eight resignations by persons charged with anti-semitism, racism, fascist leanings and Nazi collaboration.
(COAT Editor’s Note: George Bush, Jr., was responsible for spin control during his father’s 1988 campaign. When the Nazi-linked organizers within George Sr.’s Heritage Council were exposed, George Jr. urged the exposed European fascists to resign. However, four of the eight who did resign continued to hold top positions within the Republican Heritage Groups Council.)
During his 1988 presidential campaign, George Bush Sr. (like Nixon and others before him), used a Republican network lead by right-wing, East European emigres, including Nazi-collaborators. Bush is seen here at a July 20, 1988, banquet (co-sponsored by the pro-Nazi Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of nations) with Bohdan Fedorak, of the Ukrainian Nationalists (Bandera) that organized military units to massacre Ukrainian Jews in WWII.
These right-wing émigrés are a small but vocal element within the broader ethnic communities they claim to represent. They utilize anti-communist sentiments, historical revisionism and lack of knowledge about Eastern and Central Europe as a shield to deflect inspection and criticism of their past actions and current views.
The émigré fascist network organizes support for its ideological agenda through national and international coalitions of like-minded constituencies that often work with other authoritarian and pro-fascist forces. This broader coalition ranges from Axis allies and their apologists to friends and allies of contemporary dictatorships and authoritarian regimes.
The nature of the right-wing  émigré network that Reagan and Bush used to promoted their 1984 and 1988 campaigns can be illustrated by briefly reviewing the backgrounds of some of the past and current leaders of the Republican Heritage Groups Council.

The Republican Heritage Groups Council and its Nazi links
Ex-Nazis as well as fascist collaborators and sympathizers can be found at the highest levels of the Republican Heritage Group. Who are these people? Russ Bellant’s research provides much information.

Laszlo Pasztor -
Pasztor, the founding chair and a key figure in the Republican Heritage Group (and ipso facto, the Republican Party) helped form the Bulgarian National Front, headed by his friend, Ivan Docheff. As early as 1971, the GOP [“Grand Old Party,” i.e. the Republican Party] was warned that the Bulgarian National Front was “beyond the pale.” A Jack Anderson column quoted another Bulgarian-American organization, the conservative Bulgarian National Committee, which labeled Docheff’s Front as “fascist.” But the GOP took no action. Professor Spas T. Raikin, a former official of the National Front, says it grew out of a Bulgarian organization that in the 1930s and 1940s was “pro-Nazi and pro-fascist.” [Jack Anderson, “Nixon Appears a Little Soft on Nazis,” Washington Post, Nov. 10, 1971, p.B17.]

Radi Slavoff -
Slavoff, the Republican Heritage Group’s executive director, is a member of the Bulgarian GOP unit of the Group Council. [He was also the national co-chairman of Bulgarians for Bush.] Slavoff is active with the Nazi linked National Confederation of American Ethnic Groups (NCAEG), which becomes active about a year before presidential elections. NCAEG leaders have included Austin App and Josef Mikus (see below). NCAEG’s Executive Vice President, Michael Szaz, is an official of the Virginia Republican Heritage Groups Council. He is also an associate of prominent racist Roger Pearson [associated with the Nazi Northern League of northern Europe, the Heritage Foundation, the World Anti-Communist League and other fascist organizations.]

Austin App -
App, a pro-Nazi activist, and author of The Six Million Swindle, asserts that the Nazi extermination of the Jews didn’t happen. He is a founder of the NCAEG, a member of the German American National Congress and the Coalition for Peace Through Strength.
He has been particularly active in Willis Carto’s anti-Semitic Institute for Historical Review and worked with Roger Pearson on a Carto publication called Western Destiny. In 1946, App wrote that “the German armies [were] the most decent armies of the war.” In his 1974 pamphlet, “A Straight Look at the Third Reich and National Socialism, How Right? How Wrong,” App wrote: “The truth is that in WWII the Third Reich fought for justice, and the Allies fought to prevent justice.” [Foster and Epstein, p. 229, No Time for Silence: Pleas for a Just Peace Over Four Decades, 1987, p. 62; Austin
J. App, Ravishing the Conquered Women of Europe, as cited by John Roy Carlson in The Plotters, 1946, pp.160-61.]

Josef Mikus -
Mikus asserts that a German victory would have been preferable to an allied one during the WWII. Mikus was an unrepentant supporter of Monsignor Josef Tiso, the Catholic priest and leader of the Slovakian Hlinka Guard during WWII. Lucy Dawidowicz, in her book War Against the Jews, estimated that the Hlinka Guard participated in the murder of 75,000 Slovak Jews. Jack Anderson named Mikus as an advisor to various national Republican Party figures [Jack Anderson, “Doleful Dole,” Washington Post, May 18, 1978, p. A25; Jack Anderson and Les Whitten, “Nazi Eulogy,” Washington Post, May 4, 1976, p.B15.]
Photo: Hlinka Guard


Nicolas Nazarenko
A former WWII officer in the German SS Cossack Division under General Helmuth von Pannwitz, Nazarenko headed a Cossack GOP unit of the Republican Heritage Groups Council. He is still active with pro-Nazi elements in the U.S. and continues to be consumed with his wartime hatred of Jews, having on more than one occasion declared that Jews remain his “ideological enemy.” He has been accused by other Cossack émigrés with hanging Jews in Odessa during the war. He used to organize the annual “Captive Nations” march in New York City. [Note: “Captive Nations” is the term used by these fascists to describe countries with communist governments.]
Photo: Gen. Helmuth von Pannwitz


Florian Galdau
An associate of Romanian Archbishop Valerian Trifa (see below), who emigrated to the U.S. after WWII and established an American network of Nazi expatriates. Trifa brought Galdau to the U.S. in 1955 to head a New York City Iron Guard unit. (The Iron Guard was the Romanian army that collaborated with the Nazis during WWII.) Galdau’s task was to recruit new Romanian immigrants into the Guard. According to FBI documents, however, Trifa lied to Immigration authorities about his Nazi background. He also hid the fact that he had participated in the murder of Jews in Bucharest, Romania in 1941. In 1984, Archbishop Trifa was brought to trial by the Office of Special Investigation (OSI) on charges that he had filed false immigration papers. Trifa fled the country later that year to avoid prosecution, leaving behind Galdau to carry on his work. Before leaving, Trifa ordered the installation of Galdau as pastor of St. Dumitru, a Manhattan parish. It has been estimated that Galdau helped bring into the U.S. as many as 20,000 Romanian refugees – all Nazi collaborators. Over the years, Galdau has performed priestly functions at events that commemorated Iron Guard founder Corneliu Codreanu. Trifa himself once concurred in an interview that the Galdau church was “a center of fascists.”
In 1974, The United Israel Bulletin of New York headlined a story, "Florian Galdau, a Priest, Heads New York Iron Guard Cell." [Summer 1974, p.1.] Galdau is a founder of the Republican Heritage Groups Council and was listed as a member of the Host Committee for a reception honoring President Reagan’s Ambassador to the UN, Jeane Kirkpatrick and Frank Fahrenkopf, Jr., Chairman of the Republican National Committee, during the Council’s 1987 meeting in Washington, D.C. In 1988, he was named National Chair of Romanians for Bush.
Photo: This WW2-era Romanian stamp has the symbol of the Iron Guard


Valerian Trifa
Leader of the Romanian Iron Guard in Bucharest in 1941. The Guard was a pro-Nazi Romanian group linked to the SS by liaison officers such as Otto von Bolschwig of the German SS. In 1941, the Guard went on a rampage in Bucharest, seeking out Jews for gruesome deaths. Three days of chaos ensued. Witnesses charge that during those days, Trifa personally went into a jail and killed Jews. After the war, Trifa came to the U.S. and took over the Romanian Orthodox church by means of physical coercion. In 1952, Trifa became an Archbishop of the Romanian Orthodox Church.


Walter Melianovich
The head of the Byelorussian GOP unit. The unit is closely associated with the Byelorussian-American Association (BAA), an émigré group made up, in part, of former collaborators of the Nazi occupation and its extermination campaign. An early BAA leader was Franz Kushel, an SS major general and commander of the Belarus Brigade, a Waffen SS unit. According to The Belarus Secret (1982) by John Loftus, a book about Byelorussian Nazi collaboration [and the post-WWII recruitment of Byelorussians by the U.S. government], Kushel’s men took 40,000 Jews to an execution ground in 1941. Another BAA leader, Stanislaw Stankievich, the editor of a Nazifunded newspaper, came from an upper- class family of Nazi collaborators. He became mayor of Borissow in 1941. After having a wall built around the Jewish section of the city, Stankievich conducted a series of financial extortions on the contained ghetto. His police then sadistically exterminated Borissow’s 7,000 Jews on October 20, 1941. As the Soviets advanced on German-occupied Byelorussia, a puppet Byelorussian Congress was formed to help mobilize support for the defense of Germany. The 1,039 delegates to this All-Byelorussian Second Congress were screened and approved by Germany. These delegates, many of them leaders of police units and a Byelorussian Waffen SS division, came to dominate the BAA. Melianovich has met with various U.S. agencies including the National Security Council staff in an effort to return fascists to power in Byelorussia. Melianovich has even provided U.S. government leaders with a map of Byelorussia complete with new “ethnogenetical borders.” Melianovich claims that the Republican Heritage Groups Council has “changed the image of the Republican Party under our pressure.” Charging the Democrats with only caring about “the Black and Jewish vote,” he says that “if anyone should be called nationalist, it is the GOP.” Melianovich became national chairman of Byelorussians for Bush in 1988.
Photo: This monument to Byelorussian veterans of WW2 at St. Euphrosynia's Orthodox Cemetary in South River, New Jersey, contains the dreaded symbol of the Belarus Nazi SS-Division


Frank J. Fahrenkopf, jr.
Fahrenkopf, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee, became particularly linked to Croatian Republicans. For example, he signed a 1984 Republican Heritage Groups Council booklet listing commemorative dates of significance to ethnic Americans. The entry for April 10 reads: “The Independent State of Croatia was declared by unanimous proclamation in 1941.... Lack of Western support and Axis occupation forced the new state into an unfortunate association with the Axis powers.” The statement is a fabrication. Croatia was pro-Nazi long before the German occupation. The Nazis had a long-standing relationship with the Croatian Ustashi beginning years before the WWII. Indeed, the Nazis conspired with the Vatican to help create the “independent state of Croatia” after the German attack on Yugoslavia in the spring of 1941. Without Vatican and Nazi support, Croatia would never have gained its “independence.”
Soon thereafter, the Ustashi began systematically liquidating Orthodox Serbians, Jews and Gypsies. So frenzied did their effort eventually become that even the Nazis were taken aback by the barbarity of the Ustashi concentration camps and the liquidation of whole Serbian villages. Huge ovens at Jasenovac reportedly burned Serbs, Jews and Gypsies alive. An estimated 750,000 people, mostly Serbs, were killed by the Croatians. The “independent state of Croatia,” which Fahrenkopf suggests should be commemorated, ceased to exist after the fall of the Third Reich.
Croatia’s recent re-emergence under right-wing German, Austrian and Vatican pressure may very well foreshadow the kind of power structure which is currently re-surfacing in Croatia.

Method Balco
The head of the Slovak-American Republican Federation of the Republican Heritage Groups Council is a close friend of Josef Mikus and John Hvasta (see below). Like Balco, Mikus and Hvasta are members of the Slovak Republican delegation to the Republican Heritage Groups Council. All three work closely with the Toronto-based Slovak World Congress, a group set up and greatly influenced by former aides to Monsignor Josef Tiso. Tiso was the head of Slovakia, a Nazi puppet state during the war. Slovakia was created by Hitler after he split Czechoslovakia in 1939. When the U.S. declared war on Germany on Dec. 12, 1941, Tiso declared Slovakia at war with the U.S. Tiso created the Hlinka Guard, a unit allied with the German SS that slaughtered 75,000 Jews. Despite this Nazi history in Slovakia, Balco organized an annual commemoration of the Tiso rule in New York.
Photo: Josef Tiso


John Hvasta
A member of the Slovak Republican delegation to the Republican Heritage Groups Council. Hvasta also helped the 1988 Presidential Campaign of former Ku Klux Klan leader and white supremacist, David Duke. Hvasta has also been linked to Joseph Kirschbaum, a principal of the Slovak World Congress. Kirschbaum was a top commander of the SS-like Hlinka Guard. Kirschbaum edited a number of speeches by Ferdinand Durcansky, Tiso’s former foreign minister. One speech which touched on the massacre of Jews in Slovakia ominously warned, “I hope we live to see the time when the Jews draw from these facts the necessary objective conclusions.”
Source: Excerpts from Russ Bellant’s Old Nazis, the New Right and the Republican Party (Boston: South End Press, 1991). The article above, compiled by S.R. Shearer in 1996, quotes from and summarizes Bellant’s work. It is available online as: “Strange Bedfellows: The Religious Right and the Secular Right: Evangelicals are in Danger of being Defined by the Company they Keep.” <www.antipasministries.com/oldnews/bedfells.html>)

Bohdan Fedorak
 When Fedorak was the national vicechair of Ukrainians for Bush. He introduced vice-presidential candidate George H.W. Bush at a July 20, 1988, campaign stop at the Ukrainian Cultural Center, Warren, Michigan. It was a banquet in solidarity with the socalled “Captive Nations.” This banquet was co-sponsored by the pro-Nazi, Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations.
Fedorak was the top leader for external affairs in the U.S. for the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists- Bandera (OUN-B). During the Nazi occupation of the Ukraine, the OUNB organized military units that participated in terrible atrocities including pogroms in which Ukrainian Jews were massacred. Fedorak chaired the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA) in the 1980s.
He joined the Presidium of its Executive Committee in 1984. The UCCA lobbied Congress to stop the Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations from pursuing Nazilinked, Ukrainian war criminals in the U.S. The UCCA is heavily influenced but not totally controlled by the OUNB. For many years, Fedorak has been a delegate to conferences of the profascist, CIA-linked World Anti-Communist League.

Phil Guarino
Phil Guarino, vice-chair of the Republican Heritage Council and leader of its Italian section was a Republican National Committee staffer. He was removed from Bush Sr.’s 1988 campaign because of his involvement in Italy’s illegal P-2 Lodge. P-2 included top military and intelligence officers, corporate and political leaders. It was linked to the 1980 Bologna train station bombing, which killed 85. The P-2’s goal was to install a rightwing Italian dictatorship. Guarino’s ties to P-2 became known when Michele Sindona, the Vatican’s top banker, got 25 years in a U.S. prison for illegal banking. Investigations of Sindona led to Licio Gelli, the P-2 grandmaster. Sindona and Gelli were associates of Guarino. Gelli, an ardent Blackshirt in Mussolini’s Fascist Party was the P-2 leader who made violations of its oaths punishable by death. Italian police found that Guarino was corresponding with Gelli. Guarino also hosted Gelli at Reagan’s 1981 inauguration, introducing him to “members of the entourage.”
Guarino’s dealings with P-2 began no later than 1976, when Mafia- linked Sindona financed “Americans for a Democratic Italy,” cochaired by Guarino and Paul Rao, Jr. Rao is described in Luigi DiFonzo’s St. Peter’s Banker (1983) as “attorney for the head of the Gambino family.” Sindona and Gambino family members were indicted in 1982 for “operating a $600 million-a-year heroin trade between Sicily and America.”
Guarino was also involved in John Connally’s Committee for the Defense of the Mediterranean, which propagandized on the Italian Communist Party (PCI) threat to the West. Connally, a friend of Sindona, was Nixon’s Secretary of the Treasury and a member of both Nixon and Ford’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Boards.
Photo: Michele Sindona

Source: These summaries on Fedorak and Guarino was culled by Press for Conversion
editor, Richard Sanders, from Russ Bellant’s Old Nazis, the New Right & the Republican Party (1991).


"STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT & THE SECULAR RIGHT" [http://www.antipasministries.com/html/file0000049.htm] [https://archive.today/aEJG3], [begin excerpt]:
The National Republican Heritage Groups Council is an official organ of the Republican Party apparatus. It operates under the auspices of the Republican National Committee. It is not a "bit player," but carries considerable official clout within the party.
For example, on May 17, 1985, President Reagan attended a gala at Washington’s Shoreham Hotel hosted by the NRHGC. In 1987 the NRHGC hosted another gala affair in Washington at the Grand Hyatt. The featured speaker was former UN Ambassador Jeane J. Kirkpatrick. Listed on the "Honorary Committee" for the gala were Senators William Armstrong, Alfonse D’Amato, Orrin Hatch, Jesse Helms, Larry Pressler, Strom Thurmond, and Pete Wilson as well as Congresswoman Helen Bentley, and Congressmen William Broomfield, Philip Crane, Robert Dornan, John Duncan, Newt Gingrich, and Ernest Konnyu. These people are not "small fry." They are powerful and very influential members of the Republican Party.
Ex-Nazis, collaborationists and sympathizers can be found at the highest levels of the organization. Moreover, when such offices are held as a result of a popular vote of the membership, it’s not too much to assume that many of the political views of the popularly elected officials of the organization are held by the membership’s "rank and file" as well. Who then are these people? Bellant lists some. For example:

Laszlo Pasztor: The founding chair and a key figure in the Republican Heritage Group (and ipso facto, the Republican Party). Pasztor helped form the "Bulgarian National Front," a group headed by his friend, Ivan Docheff. As early as 1971, the GOP was warned that the Bulgarian National Front was "beyond the pale." A Jack Anderson column quoted another Bulgarian-American organization, the conservative "Bulgarian National Committee," which labeled Docheff’s National Front as "fascist." But the GOP took no action. Professor Spas T. Raikin, a former official of the National Front says that the "front" grew out of an organization in Bulgaria that in the 1930s and 40s was "pro-Nazi and pro fascist." [Jack Anderson, "Nixon Appears a Little Soft on Nazis," Washington Post, Nov. 10, 1971, p. B17.]

Radi Slavoff: The Republican Heritage Group’s executive director. He is a member of the Bulgarian GOP unit of the Group Council; at the same time, Bellant says that he is active with the Nazi-linked "National Confederation of American Ethnic Groups" (NCAEG). NCAEG leaders have included Austin App and Josef Mikus. Bellant says that the NCAEG is a group which becomes active about a year before presidential elections. Treasurer Richard Kolm says of the NCAEG "We don’t have contact with the Democratic Party. NCAEG has a reputation as Republican." Z. Michael Szaz is NCAEG’s Executive Vice President. Szaz is an official of the Virginia Republican Heritage Groups Council and is an associate of racialist Roger Pearson. And just who are Austin App and Josef Mikus?

Austin App: App, a pro-Nazi activist, is the author of the Six Million Swindle, which asserts that the Nazi extermination of the Jews didn’t happen. He is a founder of the NCAEG. He is also a member of the "German American National Congress" (also known by its German acronym "DANK") and the "Coalition for Peace Through Strength." He has been particularly active in Willis Carto’s anti-Semitic "Institute for Historical Review" and worked with Roger Pearson as a co-laborer on another Carto publication, Western Destiny. In 1946 App wrote that "... the German armies (were) the most decent armies of the war." Again, in his 1974 pamphlet, A Straight Look at the Third Reich and National Socialism, How Right? How Wrong," App wrote, "The truth is that in World War II the Third Reich fought for justice, and the Allies fought to prevent justice." [Foster and Epstein, p. 229, No Time for Silence: Pleas for a Just Peace Over Four Decades (Costa Mesa, California: Institute for Historical Review, 1987), p. 62; Austin J. App, Ravishing the Conquered Women of Europe, as cited by John Roy Carlson in The Plotters (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1946, pp. 160-61.]

Josef Mikus: Cut out of the same mold as App. He has been known to assert that a German victory would have been preferable to an allied one during the Second World War. Mikus was also an unrepentant supporter of Monsignor Josef Tiso, a Catholic priest and the leader of the Slovakian Hlinka Guard during World War II. Lucy Dawidowicz, in her book, War Against the Jews, estimated that the Hlinka Guard participated in the murder of some 75,000 Slovak Jews. Jack Anderson named Mikus as an advisor to various national Republican figures [Jack Anderson, "Doleful Dole," Washington Post, May 18, 1978, p. A25; Jack Anderson and Les Whitten, "Nazi Eulogy," Washington Post, May 4, 1976, p. B15.]

Nicolas Nazarenko: A former World War II officer in the German SS Cossack Division under German General Helmuth von Pannwitz, Nazarenko heads a Cossack GOP unit of the Republican Heritage Groups Council. He is still active with pro-Nazi elements in the United States and continues to be consumed with his wartime hatred of the Jews, having on more than one occasion declared that Jews remain his "ideological enemy." He has been charged by other Cossack émigrés as having hanged Jews in Odessa during the war. He used to organize the annual "Captive Nations" march in New York City every summer.

Florian Galdau: An associate of Romanian Archbishop Valerian Trifa, a leader of Romania’s Iron Guard who emigrated to America after the war. After reaching the United States, Trifa set about establishing a network of Nazi expatriates. Trifa brought Galdau to the United States in 1955 to help in his work. Galdau was brought in specifically to head a New York City Iron Guard unit. Galdau’s task was to recruit new Romanian immigrants into the Guard. According to FBI documents, however, Trifa lied to Immigration authorities concerning his Nazi background. He also hid the fact that he had participated in the murder of Jews in Bucharest, Romania in 1941. In 1984, Archbishop Trifa was brought to trial by the Office of Special Investigation (OSI) on charges that he had filed false immigration papers. Trifa fled the country later that year to avoid prosecution, leaving behind Galdau to carry on his work. Before leaving, Trifa ordered the installation of Galdau as pastor of St. Dumitru, a Manhattan parish. It has been estimated that Galdau helped bring into the country as many as 20,000 Romanian refugees - all Nazi collaborators. Over the years, Galdau has performed priestly functions at events that commemorated Iron Guard founder Corneliu Godreanu. Trifa himself once concurred in an interview that the Galdau church was "a center of fascists." In 1974, The United Israel Bulletin of New York headlined a story, "Florian Galdau, a Priest, Heads New York Iron Guard Cell." [United Israel Bulletin, Summer 1974, p. 1.] Galdau is one of the founders of the Republican Heritage Groups Council and was listed as a member of the Host Committee for a reception honoring President Reagan’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Jeane J. Kirkpatrick and Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr., Chairman of the Republican National Committee, during the Council’s 1987 meeting in Washington, D.C. In 1988 he was named National Chair of Romanians for Bush. And who exactly was Galdau’s mentor, Valerian Trifa?

Valerian Trifa: Leader of the Romanian Iron Guard in Bucharest in 1941. The Guard was a pro-Nazi Romanian group linked to the SS by liaison officers such as Otto von Bolschwig of the German SS. In 1941 the Guard went on a rampage in Bucharest, seeking out Jews for gruesome deaths. Three days of chaos ensued. During those three days, witnesses charge that Trifa personally went into a jail and killed Jews who had been put into a cell there. After the war, Trifa was able to come to the U.S. and take over the Romanian Orthodox church by means of physical coercion. In 1952, Trifa became an Archbishop of the Romanian Orthodox Church.

Walter Melianovich: The head of the Byelorussian GOP unit. The unit is closely associated with the Byelorussian-American Association (BAA), an émigré group made up, in part, of former collaborators of the Nazi occupation and its extermination campaign. An early BAA leader was Franz Kushel, an SS major general and commander of the Belarus Brigade, a Waffen SS unit. According to the Belarus Secret, a book about Byelorussian Nazi collaboration, Kushel’s men carried over 40,000 Jews to an execution ground in 1941. Another BAA leader, Stanislaw Stankievich, one-time editor of a Nazi-funded newspaper, came from an upper-class family of Nazi collaborators. He became a mayor of Borissow in 1941. After having a wall built around the Jewish section of the city, Stankievich conducted a series of financial extortions on the contained ghetto. His police than sadistically exterminated the seven thousand Jews of Borissow on October 20, 1941. As the Soviets advanced on German-occupied Byelorussia, a puppet Byelorussian Congress was formed to help mobilize support for the defense of Germany. The 1,039 delegates to this "All-Byelorussian Second Congress" were screened and approved by Germany. These delegates, many of them leaders of police units and a Byelorussian Waffen SS division, came to dominate the BAA. Melianovich has met with various U.S. agencies including the National Security Council staff in an effort to return fascists to power in Byelorussia. Melianovich has even provided U.S. government leaders with a map of Byelorussia complete with new "ethnogenetical borders." Melianovich claims that the Republican Heritage Groups Council has "changed the image of the Republican Party under our pressure." Charging the Democrats with only caring about "the Black and Jewish vote," he says that "if anyone should be called nationalist, it is the GOP." Melianovich was named National Chairman of Byelorussians for Bush in 1988.

Frank J. Fahrenkopf: for whatever reason, Fahrenkopf, the former Chairman of the Republican National Committee, has - over the years - become particularly linked to Croatian Republicans. For example, Fahrenkopf signed a 1984 Republican Heritage Groups Council booklet listing commemorative dates of significance to ethnic Americans. The entry for April 10th reads, "The Independent State of Croatia was declared by unanimous proclamation in 1941 ... Lack of Western support and Axis occupation forced the new state into an unfortunate association with the Axis powers." The statement is a fabrication. Croatia was pro-Nazi long before the German occupation. The Nazis had a long-standing relationship with the Croatian Ustashi beginning years before the Second World War; indeed, the Nazis conspired with the Vatican to help create the "independent state of Croatia" after the German attack on Yugoslavia in the spring of 1941; and it is no doubt safe to say that without Vatican and Nazi support, Croatia would never have gained its "independence." Soon thereafter, the Ustashi began systematically liquidating Orthodox Serbians, Jews, and Gypsies. So frenzied did their effort eventually become that even the Nazis were taken aback by the barbarity of the Ustashi concentration camps and the liquidation of whole Serbian villages. Huge ovens at Jasenovac reportedly burned Serbs, Jews and Gypsies alive. An estimated 750,000 people, mostly Serbians, were killed by the Croatians. The "independent state of Croatia," which Fahrenkopf suggests should be commemorated, ceased to exist after the fall of the Third Reich. It’s re-emergence four years ago under right-wing German, Austrian and Vatican pressure may very well foreshadow the kind of power structure which is currently re-surfacing in Croatia.

Method Balco: The head of the Slovak-American Republican Federation of the Republican Heritage Groups Council. He is a close friend of Josef Mikus (see above) and John Hvasta. Like Balco, Mikus and Hvasta are members of the Slovak Republican delegation to the Republican Heritage Groups Council. All three work closely with the Toronto-based Slovak World Congress, a group set up and greatly influenced by former aides to Monsignor Josef Tiso. Tiso was head of Slovakia, a Nazi puppet state, during the war. Slovakia was created by Hitler after he split Czechoslovakia in 1939. When the U.S. declared war on Germany on December 12, 1941, Tiso declared Slovakia at war with the U.S. Tiso created the Hlinka Guard, a unit allied with the German SS, which was responsible for the slaughter of some 75,000 Jews. Despite the Nazi history in Slovakia, Balco still organizes an annual commemoration of the Tiso rule in New York.

John Hvasta: A member of the Slovak Republican delegation to the Republican Heritage Groups Council. Hvasta also helped the 1988 Presidential Campaign of former Ku Klux Klan leader and white supremacist David Duke. Hvasta has also been linked to Joseph Kirschbaum, a principal of the Slovak World Congress. Kirschbaum was a top commander of the SS-like Hlinka Guard. Kirschbaum is responsible for editing a number of speeches by Ferdinand Durcansky, Tiso’s former foreign minister. One speech which touched on the massacre of Jews in Slovakia ominously warned, "... I hope we live to see the time when the Jews draw from these facts the necessary objective conclusions ..."

These people are Nazi collaborationists and sympathizers pure and simple. There is no other way that one can describe them. How does one explain away the participation of these men in groups which are so clearly Nazi oriented as the Arrow Cross, the Iron Guard, the Belarus Brigade, the Hlinka Guard, etc?
"In a sense ... the foundation of the Republican Heritage Groups Council ... (lies) in Hitler’s networks ... (in) East Europe before World War II. In each of those Eastern European countries, the German SS set up or funded political action organizations that helped form SS militias during the war.
"In Hungary the Arrow Cross was the Hungarian SS affiliate; in Romania, the Iron Guard; the Bulgarian Legion, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), the Latvian Legion, and the Byelorussian (White Russian) Belarus Brigade were all SS-linked. In each of their respective countries, they were expected to serve the interests of the German Nazi Party before and during the war.
"Many of these groups formed SS divisions: the Ukrainian Nationalists formed the 14th Galician Division, Waffen SS; the Latvians formed the 15th and 19th Divisions, Waffen SS; etc. These units and related German-controlled police units had several functions. The Ukrainian division unsuccessfully tried to impede the advance of the Soviet army against the Nazis. Others hunted down those fellow countrymen who opposed the German occupation of Eastern Europe during World War II.
"More sadistically, many units rounded up hundreds of thousands of Jews, Poles, and others and conducted mass murders on the spot, sometimes decimating whole villages. They perfected ‘mobile killing teams’ as efficient means of mass executions. Little is known about these units compared to the concentration camps, gas chambers, and ovens, but they were an integrated component of the ‘Final Solution’. Approximately one-third of the victims of the Holocaust, perhaps as many as two million, died at the hands of these units ... .
"It is a historical fact that (very large numbers) ... from virtually every Eastern European nationality tied their ... goals to the rising star of fascism and Hitler’s racialist Nazism" - something which East European apologists today have successfully attempted to obscure. [Russ Bellant, Old Nazis, the New Right, and the Republican Party (South End Press, Boston, 1991) pgs. 4-5.]
It is, incidentally, out of these East European émigré communities, communities which "set up shop" here after the fall of Nazi Germany, that PAUL WEYRICH - perhaps the most powerful man in today’s Religious Right / Secular Right Nexus - is attempting to "reconstruct democracy" in the break-away member states of the Old Soviet Empire - countries like Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Balarus, the Ukraine, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, etc. Members of these communities (many of whom are the unrepentant sons and daughters of former SS officers and collaborators) are now streaming back - with Weyrich’s assistance - to these former satellite countries and have to a very large extent already seized the reigns of power in their former homelands. God help these countries - they’re jumping from the frying pan into the fire in accepting Weyrich’s help.

PAUL WEYRICH & THE CONNECTION OF ALL THIS TO THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT
All these men - and many more besides - now rub sholders on a regular basis with evangelicals as a result of the alliance evangelicals have struck with the Republican Party - and to a large extent, it's Paul Weyrich who has made all this possible. The story goes something like this: in 1976, Richard Viguerie, Howard Phillips, and Paul Weyrich began looking for a political vehicle through which they could facilitate a rightward drift of the American electorate. Eventually they hit upon forcing the Republican Party to move to the Right by using Jerry Falwell and other "born-again" evangelical leaders to mobilize conservative "born-again" Christians. The specifics of the story are as follows: in May of 1979 Robert Billings of the National Christian Action Coalition invited Jerry Falwell to a meeting with Phillips, Viguerie, Weyrich and Ed McAteer.
The four told Falwell of their shared opposition to legalized abortion and pornography, and their intention to influence the 1980 GOP platform. Weyrich proposed that if the Republican Party could be persuaded to take a firm stance against abortion, that would split the hitherto strong Catholic voting bloc within the Democratic Party.
The New Right leaders wanted Falwell to spearhead a visible Christian organization that would apply pressure to the GOP. Weyrich proposed that the name have something to do with a moral majority. The rest is history. Joining Falwell’s plunge into "Christian politics" as members of the Moral Majority’s Board of Directors were Charles Stanley of First Baptist Church of Atlanta, Greg Dixon of Indianapolis’ Baptist Temple, Rev. Tim LaHaye from San Diego, California and James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church in Florida. Ronald Godwin was hired as vice president and Robert Billings became executive director.
While the Moral Majority has since passed from the scene, all of these men remain committed, in one way or another, to "returning America to Christ and the Church" - and, as time has worn on - many of them have become increasingly willing to make compromises in order to further their political agenda - for example, Kennedy’s relationship with Moon in the Coalition for Religious Freedom. [See Sara Diamond, Spiritual Warfare, pg. 69.]
The entrance of the Moral Majority into the political fray has enticed millions of hitherto apolitical Protestant evangelicals into the electoral process, many for the first time; it has succeeded in splitting off Catholics from the Democratic Coalition; and it has acted as a catalyst for a political rapprochement between Catholics and Protestants. The forces the Moral Majority helped to set in motion continue today in such newer organizations as the Christian Coalition, the Traditional Values Coalition, etc.

THE ATTEMPTED TAKEOVER OF THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY
What is not so well known, however, is Weyrich’s, Phillips’, and Viguerie’s initial effort to take over the American Independent Party (AIP). It was only after this effort failed that they turned to their "Republican Party Strategy" and Jerry Falwell.
The AIP had been originally formed as a vehicle for the George Wallace campaign of 1968, and was a coalition which included elements of the Ku Klux Klan, John Birchers and the Liberty Lobby. All three - Weyrich, Phillips, and Viguerie - attended the AIP convention of 1976 where the convention’s keynote speaker - to the sound of thunderous applause - pontificated on various elements of the Illuminati Myth and labeled Zionism "as the most insidious, far-reaching, murderous force the world has ever known."
None of the three seemed particularly turned off by the verbiage. They eventually gave up on the AIP only because the party turned to Lestor Maddox, a white supremacist, to head the ticket rather than Viguerie.
The magazine, Human Events, a conservative weekly, seemed to confirm this analysis. It reported that the long-range plan of Viguerie, Weyrich, and Phillips at the time was to use the AIP to form the backbone for a new party in the 1980 elections. Rather than rejecting the segregationist AIP, they had sought to incorporate the AIP - with its racist, anti-Semitic, and neo-fascist elements - into their plans to shape the future political course of the United States. [Please see Human Events, September 11, 1976, pgs. 3-4.]


Leaders of Civilian Military Assistance (CMA) rally in Chicago, Illinois November 1, 1985 sponsored by CMA of Illinois. From left to right, Art Jones, neo-Nazi leader of the reconstituted America First Committee, Guy A. Hoch, rally coordinator and acting secretary for CMA of Illinois, and Tom Posey, national director of CMA. (Photo 1986 Paul L Merideth / PRA)

Art Jones, in full Nazi regalia, enters Chicago's Gage Park Fieldhouse with his followers for a 1979 rally against integration. While Jones no longer wears a swastika in public, his speeches and writings continue to reflect a neo-Nazi agenda with virulent anti-Jewish and anti-Black pronouncements. (Photo 1986 Chip Berlet / PRA)



"GOP heritage groups up and running" (2004) [http://www.ukrweekly.com/old/archive/2004/190417.shtml] [https://archive.today/gpUto]:
During the Reagan administration, various Ukrainian American leaders met with the president to voice their support for his "evil empire" posture towards the Soviet Union. Jaroslaw Stetsko, chairman of the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations, was also invited to the White House.
As ethnic influence in the Republican Party and the White House increased, individuals influenced by the Sovietophile left in American politics began a vicious villification campaign against ethnic groups associated with the Captive Nations lobby.
The most egregrious charge appeared in a left-wing publication titled "Old Nazis, the New Right and the Reagan Administration" by Russ Ballant. Published by Political Research Associates (described as "an independent research institute which collects and disseminates information on right-wing political groups and trends"), this particular perversion argued that "old Nazis" and "fascists" were influencing American foreign policy and prolonging the Cold War. As long as anti-Soviet ethnics were allowed into the White House, Mr. Ballant argued, a true peace with the Soviets would never be achieved. A similar piece authored by the notorious Joe Conason appeared in The Village Voice.
It was as if Department D of the KGB Second Chief Directorate was calling the shots.
Although there was absolutely no proof that any of the charges were valid, the RNC apparently decided that the Heritage Groups Council was not worth the trouble. Slowly, and painfully for some of us, the RNC nationalities division was allowed to wither on the vine. Relying on erroneous information regarding Ukraine - I suspect then National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft was the source - President George Bush visited Kyiv following a meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and urged Ukrainians to remain loyal to Moscow. All Ukrainians were mortified by what has come to be known as Mr. Bush's "Chicken Kiev" speech.